July 12, 2011

Cyber Coverage: The New ‘Must-Have’ In The Property & Casualty Portfolio?

Filed under: commercial insurance — cleavelandinsurance @ 2:01 pm

Cyber Coverage: The New ‘Must-Have’ In The Property & Casualty Portfolio?

National Underwriter P&C March-15, 2010 | Subscribe Now By Rick Grimes, Karen Kutger

If current trends continue, cyber insurance coverage just may take its place alongside workers’ compensation, general liability, fire and auto insurance in the core commercial property and casualty package, meaning a business would be foolish to open its doors without it.

The reason is simple. Virtually every modern enterprise–from the local doctor’s office or supermarket to Fortune 100 corporations–lives and breathes on its information technology applications, databases and computer systems.

When IT goes down, business screeches to a halt.

Indeed, for businesses such as online retailers, brokerages and some financial firms, the IT and data assets are the entire business–every bit as critical as the factory and warehouse are to the hard-goods manufacturer, or the vehicle fleet to a trucking company.

Imagine Amazon.com or a regional bank trying to do business without their databases and computer systems.

As more and more companies–and their insurers–are realizing, this reliance on IT creates a hornet’s nest of risks that can result in crippling losses that conventional, turn-of-the-century P&C insurance coverages won’t respond to. These new issues call for a new category of coverage.

THE NEW RISKS

On the one hand is the issue of first-party losses. These might include business interruption, which could be caused by a flood or fire in a data center, or malicious hacking by a disgruntled employee or even a cyber-crook half a world away.

Traditional p&c insurance might help replace some of the lost hardware or compensate for physical damage to the data center. Yet there is no coverage for the onerous costs of restoring data, reinstalling software, or for lost revenue, since standard p&c packages typically exclude such losses completely.

It means a company could be out of business for days or weeks, while also being responsible for costs of restoring the IT functionality.

Perhaps even more ominous are the all-new liability exposures inherent in IT operations. A raft of relatively new regulations and legislation makes companies responsible for safeguarding personal and confidential data they collect as part of everyday e-commerce operations.

Companies are liable for customer credit card numbers, financial transactions, medical history, credit information and other sensitive data.

Regulations ranging from HIPAA (the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) for health care information to Sarbanes-Oxley and an array of state laws provide stiff penalties for companies that mishandle data, permit leaks or unauthorized access, or otherwise fail to safeguard sensitive information, which conventional insurance will not cover.

There is also the risk of being sued by third parties for somehow allowing–or failing to prevent–unauthorized access to sensitive information.

An example of this would be an overseas hacker who infiltrates an online shopping Web site and steals hundreds of thousands of customer credit card numbers. The Web site now faces claims from angry customers for unauthorized charges made on their credit cards, as well as claims from banks that issued the cards for costs incurred in canceling and reissuing them.

Traditional insurance simply will not apply here.

The new reality is that criminals, terrorists and insiders are beginning to recognize that the real Achilles heel of today’s companies and organizations is the IT side of their businesses. Secrets, sensitive data and inside information have now become their prime targets.

THE INSURANCE OPTIONS

Since common p&c insurance coverage doesn’t respond to most IT and privacy-related losses–and are in fact specifically excluded in most forms–major carriers and specialty insurers are now offering an array of cyber products designed to address the critical gaps.

These cyber products–usually called “Network Security and Privacy Liability” policies–tend to vary significantly from carrier to carrier, as the markets try to discern what provisions and terms prove most attractive to enterprise customers at different levels of risk. The situation is similar to where employment practices liability insurance was just a few years ago.

The Network Security and Privacy Liability policies are generally designed to address first-party risks and third-party liability–sometimes in the same policies, sometimes separately.

First-party coverage typically includes:

  • Business Interruption
  •  Data Restoration
  •  Cyber Extortion Payments
  •  Crisis Management Expenses
  •  Media/Intellectual Property
  •  Regulatory Actions
  • Expenses to Notify Affected Parties
  •  Expenses to provide credit monitoring
  •  Forensic costs to determine how the breach occurred
  •  Transmission of a virus/worm
  •  Loss or damage to an organization’s own network, or e-theft

    The third-party side usually addresses liability arising from network and information security, privacy liability and electronic media. (See related text box, “Liability Risks”)

    Depending on the nature of a company’s operations and IT structure, insureds can negotiate a number of coverage enhancements that address situations not covered in the core policy.

  • Coverage could be extended to cover the actions of “rogue” employees, authorized staff acting in an unauthorized manner, or to independent contractors or outsourcers.
  • Coverage could also be extended to cover off-line or non-electronic data that contains sensitive or private data, and is somehow breached or released.
  • First-party expenses might also be negotiated for the costs of restoring a network after a breach, investigations of the breach, costs of workarounds, or short-term services to restore functionality.
  • Defense costs, civil penalties and fines due to regulatory actions, as well as amounts that must be deposited into redress or settlement funds.
  • UNDERWRITING CYBER

    Thanks in part to an overall soft market, capacity for cyber coverage is abundant at this point; however, one sector that is facing increased underwriting scrutiny is the financial institutions segment.

    In addition to evaluating basics like revenue, employee count and the nature of the business, underwriters take into account the technical safeguards a company has in place, its overall privacy and security policies–and occasionally, the recommendations of an outside consultant or security auditor.

    Underwriters may also require certain upgrades to procedures or technology as a condition of the insurance.

    In designing insurance coverage for an enterprise, agents and insureds should start with a thorough assessment of potential risks and vulnerabilities of the existing systems, perhaps with the help of a security specialist, and then secure the appropriate insurance coverage.

    Network Security and Privacy Liability insurance is just another important component of a risk management strategy in today’s business environment. The more businesses rely on information technology as an engine for operations and communication, the more crucial it becomes to protect IT assets with the right coverage.

    Rick Grimes is an executive vice president for Professional Risk Solutions, a wholesale insurance broker that places directors and officers, errors and omissions and cyber security and liability coverages headquartered in Somerset, N.J. Mr. Grimes may be reached at rick@prsbrokers.com.

    Karen Kutger, vice president and branch manager for the Philadelphia branch of Professional Risk Solutions, may be reached at Karen@prsbrokers.com.

July 7, 2011

Insurers Pay $509M in Joplin Tornado Claims; Up to $2B Expected

Filed under: auto insurance, commercial insurance — cleavelandinsurance @ 12:45 pm

Insurers Pay $509M in Joplin Tornado Claims; Up to $2B Expected

July 5, 2011 | Subscribe Now By Chad Hemenway, PropertyCasualty360.com

NU Online News Service, July 5, 3:06 p.m. EDT

Insurance companies have paid more than $509 million on nearly 15,000 residential, personal and commercial claims filed after the Joplin, Mo. tornado May 22.

John M. Huff, director of the Missouri Department of Insurance, says the EF-5 twister “will be the largest insurance event in Missouri history.”

“This is half a billion dollars already reinvested into the local economy, and we expect it to be three to four times that amount by the times all claims are settled,” he adds.

Though Huff’s office has received a “steady stream of consumer complaints,” the industry’s response “has been commendable,” says a statement.

Slideshow: View the Damage in Joplin, Missouri

About $311.7 million has been paid on more than 7,000 homeowners’ claims. A thousand more claims are expected, according to reports to the insurance department from insurers. About $157.8 million has been paid to settle about 1,530 commercial property claims. Insurers also doled out $34.2 million for personal auto claims and $1.8 million for commercial auto claims, the department says.

Catastrophe risk modeler AIR Worldwide says thunderstorms in the U.S. from May 20 to May 27 are expected to cause between $4 billion and $7 billion in insured losses.

Though Missouri was the hardest hit by storms during this period, 20 states were impacted from Texas to the East Coast.

Modeler Eqecat says insured losses for the Joplin, Mo. tornado—the deadliest twister in more than 60 years—could be between $1 billion and $3 billion. City officials say more than 150 people died from the tornado.

July 6, 2011

FEMA Eyes Debt Take-Back As Hurricane Season Looms

Filed under: auto insurance, commercial insurance — cleavelandinsurance @ 2:09 pm

FEMA Eyes Debt Take-Back As Hurricane Season Looms

June 1, 2011 | Subscribe Now By Michael Kunzelman, Associated Press, Ryan J. Foley, Associated Press

FILE -In this Dec. 15, 2005 file photo, the moon rises over FEMA trailers and damaged homes in St. Bernard Parish, La. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert, File)

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — Nearly six years have passed since Hurricane Katrina drowned New Orleans in misery, but many residents haven’t forgiven the Federal Emergency Management Agency for its sluggish response to the storm. Now another delayed reaction by FEMA — a stop-and-start push to recoup millions of dollars in disaster aid — is reminding storm victims why they often cursed the agency’s name.

As a new hurricane season begins Wednesday, FEMA is working to determine how much money it overpaid or mistakenly awarded to victims of the destructive 2005 hurricane season. The agency is reviewing more than $600 million given to roughly 154,000 victims of hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma and is poised to demand that some return money.

FEMA already has sent letters to thousands of victims of other disasters, asking them to return more than $22 million. Letters to victims of the 2005 hurricanes could go out in a matter of months, but it’s too soon to tell how many people will be told to repay or how much money is at stake.

The effort isn’t sitting well with victims who spent the money years ago and who could need help again if another powerful storm hits. It’s of little consolation that FEMA says procedural changes since 2005 mean future disaster victims aren’t likely to have to deal with large recalls of cash.

Government forecasters are expecting an above average Atlantic storm season, with three to six major hurricanes that have winds of 111 mph or higher. While no hurricane that strong has made landfall since 2005, forecasters have warned that residents shouldn’t count on that streak to continue.

“When you get these high levels of activity the likelihood of a hurricane striking the U.S. goes up quite a bit,” said Gerry Bell, lead seasonal hurricane forecaster at NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center in Washington.

Paul Wegener, whose New Orleans home flooded up to the gutters after Katrina, felt short-changed when FEMA gave him a $30,000 grant for a house that wound up costing more than $566,000 to rebuild. He applied for more through the state’s Road Home program but was told he didn’t qualify. The thought of having to return some of his federal aid only compounds his frustration.

“They’ll have to pry it from my dead hands if they try,” the 75-year-old said.

Under political pressure to help residents after Katrina, FEMA relaxed its safeguards and paid millions so victims could pay for food, clothing, shelter and medicine and also get started on home repairs.

But that allowed thousands of improper and fraudulent payments. FEMA employees awarded money without interviewing applicants or inspecting property and made errors that ranged from recording incorrect banking information to failing to check whether insurance had already covered damage, according to congressional testimony.

The 154,000 cases under review account for less than 10 percent of the $7 billion that FEMA has given to victims of the 2005 hurricanes through its individual assistance program. The recoupment effort doesn’t apply to other big-dollar disaster aid programs, like Road Home, which was financed by a congressional block grant.

July 5, 2011

United Fire & Casualty Says Up To $35M In Spring-Storm Cat Losses

Filed under: auto insurance, commercial insurance — cleavelandinsurance @ 3:29 pm

United Fire & Casualty Says Up To $35M In Spring-Storm Cat Losses

June 1, 2011 | Subscribe Now By Staff Writer

NU Online News Service, June 1, 2:35 p.m. EDT

United Fire & Casualty Co. (UFCS) says it expects second-quarter catastrophe losses of between $30 million and $35 million due to spring storms that have spawned deadly tornadoes in the U.S.

Cedar Rapids, Iowa-based UFCS says the losses include around $7 million to $9 million in storm losses reported in the company’s first-quarter news release, $5 million to $6 million from April storms in Southern states, and $15 million to $20 million from the May 22 Joplin, Mo. storm.

The company says the storms will likely contribute between 21.9 and 25.5 points toward the second-quarter combined ratio.

Describing the magnitude of losses the storms have caused, UFCS President and CEO Randy A. Ramlo says, “Over the past 10 years, catastrophe losses for the second quarter have averaged $8 million, compared with a full-year expected average of $25 million.”

He notes, though, that the lost lives and devastation have had a far greater impact.

Yesterday, State Farm said it has doled out nearly $916 million in claims payments from the storms, and added that recent destructive storms and tornadoes in Joplin, Oklahoma and Texas continue to be processed.

More than 120 people died in the Joplin tornado, making it the deadliest in more than 60 years. Catastrophe risk modeling firm EQECAT says insured losses for the Joplin tornado could be between $1 billion and $3 billion.

July 1, 2011

Featured Fraud: Washed Away

Filed under: auto insurance, commercial insurance — cleavelandinsurance @ 11:54 am

Featured Fraud: Washed Away

June 10, 2011 | Subscribe Now By Catherine Couretas, PropertyCasualty360.com

When the words “flood damage” come to mind, many think of damaged basements and ruined carpet. A 25-year-old Iowa man, however, claimed he suffered from what many people this spring have had to deal with after the devastating storms: a damaged vehicle. 

Douglas McKim, of Colfax County, Iowa, filed a claim after his vehicle was allegedly damaged from area flooding in August of 2010. Those allegations were deemed false, however, and McKim will now have to fork over some cash rather than receiving any from an insurance payout.

Additionally, investigation by the Jasper County Sheriff’s Office and the Iowa Insurance Fraud Bureau revealed there may be others involved in filing false claims after the flooding as well.

Right now, McKim is facing a class D felony, which comes with a $750 to $7,500 price tag and up to 5 years in jail. Perhaps McKim has learned that the real damage that comes from a false flood claim is only to one’s wallet and freedom